Home / Editorial Methodology

Editorial Methodology

Our goal is to make ETF research understandable without disguising estimates, opinions, or stale figures as current facts.

Sources and data dates

We prefer fund issuer documents, SEC filings, index providers, government publications, and clearly identified market-data providers. Material figures should name their source and snapshot date. Because prices, assets, yields, holdings, and fees can change, readers should confirm current fund details with the issuer.

Research and calculations

We separate observed data from editorial interpretation. Comparisons use like-for-like periods where practical, and calculations are checked against the cited inputs. Rankings and “best” labels are educational judgments based on stated criteria—not guarantees or personalized recommendations.

Writing and review

The Editorial Desk checks search intent, factual claims, source quality, internal consistency, disclosures, and readability before publication. Software and AI tools may assist with research organization, drafting, translation, or quality checks; they do not replace source verification or editorial responsibility.

Updates and material changes

News and flow articles are time-stamped snapshots. Evergreen guides are reviewed when a material fund detail changes or when an editorial review identifies an accuracy or clarity issue. A displayed “updated” date reflects a meaningful content review, not an automatic timestamp change.

Independence and limitations

Content is general education, not individualized investment, tax, or legal advice. We do not claim professional review unless the reviewer and credentials are explicitly disclosed. See our terms and disclosures and corrections policy.